<blockquote><hr>
<blockquote><hr>
Thank you for the support but I was just as wrong as they where and my responses only flamed them on and
made them feel important. So from now on
in an effort not to be on there level they just simply do not exist and I will not be responding to them.
[/ QUOTE ]
What I find funny is that that statement by you is just another troll and another flame.
The implication behind the words is :
1. you feel you are more important than 'them'
or that they 'don't rate' in your eyes as being 'important'
or that whatever you said to 'them' must of been the 'right' view of a topic so by being in disagreement with whatever they said it just "flamed them on" to give them this sense of "importance" that you consider they have. There is no admittance that your input to a particular topic could have been totally incorrect hence why someone would continue to debate an issue with you rather than back off yourself. Or perhaps the continued input to a topic is to make yourself look 'important' in your eyes rather than them making a response to look important in 'their' eyes?
2. exactly 'what' level are they on? That statement alone implies that you consider that you are in some way 'above' their level. It is patronizing and basically flaming in itself. It implies that you are right and by having conversation with said 'them' you are in some way lowering your standards to that of someone lesser than yourself. Perhaps your standards are the same only 'you' view yours as 'better' or more 'politically correct'? The fact that others may not take this view doesn't seem to impact on you.
You seriously need to get a grasp on what is and isn't a flame or a troll if you are starting a thread to 'supposedly' apologize on forum trolling. Because the above statement alone is just another example of your brand of trolling and flaming. The fact you don't call people 'newb' or use the same type of 'language' does not mean that the words you write are not basic flaming and trolling just in 'nicer' language.
and as for:
<blockquote><hr>
they just simply do not exist and I will not be responding to them.
[/ QUOTE ]
well if that isn't just plain condescending then I suggest you get out a dictionary.
Condescending:
1. To descend to the level of one considered inferior; lower oneself.
2. To deal with people in a patronizingly superior manner.
And no, this is not a post to 'flame' you, but to point out that if you are going to set yourself up as a 'newly converted ex troll', then you should at least stop trolling yourself.
As they say 'people in glass houses.... '
End of my input to this thread so flame away to your hearts content.
[/ QUOTE ]
DESPITE WHAT YOU CLAIM THIS NOT TO BE
it again is another post by you where you seem to think you are innocent and not capable of immature behavior??? As you are not one I really previously considered a serial troll, I will answer you but this post by you is purely a troll and based on your biased and personal feelings of dislike because I do not take your "oh poor me" bull dust you spout on about or your abuse you feel your entitled to deal out without consequence.
Which was what I found very amusing in your rant about the community of Oceania in the other thread ...you put others down for there behavior in the community yet it is perfectly acceptable for you to stand at luna bank and rant at people and abuse them and send abusive icq messages and emails.......your not as innocent as you are pretending to be miss echo and your certainly not someone's who's opinions mean much to me....so heed your own advice people in glass houses should certainly not throw stones, how ever if they do at least be gutsy enough to admit your own failings.
so as the button says go back to your bridge you have no power here........and this will be my last reply to you as you are not worth my time or effort.
Now I will go back to the intent of my response to farscape which was end the thread and stop people from trolling. Clearly you missed that intention but having your own agenda your focused on will do that.
